Topic: Fantasy & Games
Tapology wagering league. Continuation
Anonymous Mode
You are not logged in to Tapology. When browsing anonymously, profanities and images are automatically removed from the forum.
Responses Page 9
07.25.2022 | 5:54 AM ET
According to your post, I think that you wanted to make 14 bets on UFC FN London fights.
But here we bet by 5Dimes rates published at bestfightodds.com. And for this event there were no rates for some of your prediction results. For example, try to find there rate for "Aspinall wins by KO/TKO in round 2".
But here we bet by 5Dimes rates published at bestfightodds.com. And for this event there were no rates for some of your prediction results. For example, try to find there rate for "Aspinall wins by KO/TKO in round 2".
* Edited at 07.25.2022, 5:55 AM ET *
07.25.2022 | 6:39 AM ET
Check out my post again, it's only 2K on every fighter, ( non parlay - round - way of winning )
"KURZHAAR - Tomorrow Never Comes Until It's Too Late"
07.25.2022 | 1:19 PM ET
Tartara, I think you were trying to save time by posting your picks.
But the best way is just to write out your bets like everyone else.
More for the reason to keep it easier for Balamut. He does put in time and effort to keep this running, I think we should all make things easy as possible for him
But the best way is just to write out your bets like everyone else.
More for the reason to keep it easier for Balamut. He does put in time and effort to keep this running, I think we should all make things easy as possible for him
"Sometimes maybe good, sometimes maybe ****! "
07.25.2022 | 1:55 PM ET
Yeah,
but not that my bets aren't "valid", they must count !
but not that my bets aren't "valid", they must count !
"KURZHAAR - Tomorrow Never Comes Until It's Too Late"
-
- Hippie
07.25.2022 | 7:23 PM ET
Correct?
So I think what TarTara is betting is straight bets. Simple.
He lost 10K
He won 18K
(He made 8K)
2K in all of my picks !
( non parlay - round - way of winning )
He lost 10K
He won 18K
(He made 8K)
2K in all of my picks !
( non parlay - round - way of winning )
07.25.2022 | 8:52 PM ET
Non parlay - Round - Way of winning. The two ways it could be interpreted
The sticking point is "Non parlay - Round - Way of winning". We can completely rule out any parlays due to the "non parlay" part and in any case, prop bets in parlays are against the rules. The trouble is it could be interpreted as "$2k in all my picks. No parlays BUT round AND way of winning" which would mean $2k on all the props. If this is the case, then some bets would be invalid as @Balamut pointed out as 5Dimes didn't have odds for all those specific bets. If this is what @TARTARA meant then the "Pimblett - Round 2 - Submission" would win as would his 3 decision wins for Diakiese, Wood and Dalby. So 4 winning prop bets. I don't know if 5Dimes had the odds for those winners or not though.
THE OTHER WAY IT COULD BE TAKEN
Is the way @Hippie interpreted it as $2k straights for each fighter. Again, we can completely rule out any parlays as he clearly says "non parlay". In this case, it could be read as "2k in all my picks. No parlays. No rounds. No way of winning" It could certainly be read this way but it would've been a lot simpler to say something like "$2k straight in all my picks" or "$2k straight on each fighter". It's the lack of the term "straight" that's causing the confusion but in the first case you could also argue he didn't put the term "props" for it either.
That's just my take on it. All I'm gonna say is holy ****, am I glad I'm not the one to decide how to interpret that lol!
THE OTHER WAY IT COULD BE TAKEN
Is the way @Hippie interpreted it as $2k straights for each fighter. Again, we can completely rule out any parlays as he clearly says "non parlay". In this case, it could be read as "2k in all my picks. No parlays. No rounds. No way of winning" It could certainly be read this way but it would've been a lot simpler to say something like "$2k straight in all my picks" or "$2k straight on each fighter". It's the lack of the term "straight" that's causing the confusion but in the first case you could also argue he didn't put the term "props" for it either.
That's just my take on it. All I'm gonna say is holy ****, am I glad I'm not the one to decide how to interpret that lol!
* Edited at 07.25.2022, 8:52 PM ET *
"I wish you good luck but I don't want you to rely on luck"
07.25.2022 | 8:57 PM ET
Its pretty simple folks.
Lets just do it the same way we always have!!! Simples!
Lets just do it the same way we always have!!! Simples!
"Sometimes maybe good, sometimes maybe ****! "
-
- Hippie
07.25.2022 | 9:16 PM ET
Trying to help, no troubles.. only IMO 😊
07.25.2022 | 9:31 PM ET
Seems to be a lot of uncertainty and confusion here. Nothing like this happens in the Tapology Survivor Game. That guy runs a smooth operation.
"Dont take life too serious, you will never make it out alive."
07.25.2022 | 10:31 PM ET
I think this is a problem that's pretty easy to solve really. You're all really ******* stupid, FYI.
Basically, Tartara should be paid out for every correct pick he made by dec at whatever the dec rate was paying, but should not be paid out for any fight he picked by method and round whether that pick was correct or not because those are separate bets, and a win in one category would not reflect the money he'd have lost in the other. This is because for example, there was no such line as Pimblett by R2 submission offered by the brokerages which are acknowledged by Balamut, who runs the game and has veto power over which brokerages' lines are valid entries. Pimblett by R2 sub is two bets at least and possibly three. You can't hedge a stake two or three ways via different instruments. Believe me, if you could, I'd be rich as ****.
That's it. Uncle Fishrat has solved the great mystery for you, and we can all carry on.
@Tartara in future strive to place your bets in the same format as everybody else.
Basically, Tartara should be paid out for every correct pick he made by dec at whatever the dec rate was paying, but should not be paid out for any fight he picked by method and round whether that pick was correct or not because those are separate bets, and a win in one category would not reflect the money he'd have lost in the other. This is because for example, there was no such line as Pimblett by R2 submission offered by the brokerages which are acknowledged by Balamut, who runs the game and has veto power over which brokerages' lines are valid entries. Pimblett by R2 sub is two bets at least and possibly three. You can't hedge a stake two or three ways via different instruments. Believe me, if you could, I'd be rich as ****.
That's it. Uncle Fishrat has solved the great mystery for you, and we can all carry on.
@Tartara in future strive to place your bets in the same format as everybody else.
* Edited at 07.25.2022, 10:36 PM ET *
This user is suspended from posting until 9 years, 1 month, 2 weeks, 2 days, 12 hours, and 53 minutes from now.
07.25.2022 | 11:12 PM ET
Guys it's simple,
I made 2K bets in all of my picks, only on the fighter, ( not parlay, not round, not way of winning ) !
And the only reason i did it this way, was because i really wanted to bet on all of my picks, and i didn't want to forget any of them, or to make any mistake with copying the names or the odds... !
It's really amazing that you really trying so hard to pretend that you don't understand... im starting to think other things because of all of this behavior... !
If you don't count my bets... i don't want to continue in this "theatrical thing"... !
In one other Sportsbook League, i have almost 13 Millions, but they have a deferrent layout, in a betting thead they make a separated section for any fight of the event, so you just click in and you only put the money that you want to bet... !
I made 2K bets in all of my picks, only on the fighter, ( not parlay, not round, not way of winning ) !
And the only reason i did it this way, was because i really wanted to bet on all of my picks, and i didn't want to forget any of them, or to make any mistake with copying the names or the odds... !
It's really amazing that you really trying so hard to pretend that you don't understand... im starting to think other things because of all of this behavior... !
If you don't count my bets... i don't want to continue in this "theatrical thing"... !
In one other Sportsbook League, i have almost 13 Millions, but they have a deferrent layout, in a betting thead they make a separated section for any fight of the event, so you just click in and you only put the money that you want to bet... !
"KURZHAAR - Tomorrow Never Comes Until It's Too Late"
-
- Hippie
07.25.2022 | 11:25 PM ET
^
Have to agree!
07.25.2022 | 11:49 PM ET
"KURZHAAR - Tomorrow Never Comes Until It's Too Late"
07.26.2022 | 12:01 AM ET
@Tartara fair enough if that's what you meant but it's a weird way of doing it. If you just meant every fighter you picked at moneyline that's fine.
This user is suspended from posting until 9 years, 1 month, 2 weeks, 2 days, 12 hours, and 53 minutes from now.
07.26.2022 | 12:16 AM ET
Yeah, i usually bet my picks, somewhere 3 - 5 at the time, but i didn't have much time to do a break down to which fights to bet, and i didn't want to put deferrent amount of money ob every fighter, so i did it this way, if i had a few money more i will put 3K on all the fights... ! It's that simple, and i don't really understand way all this mess happened... !?
"KURZHAAR - Tomorrow Never Comes Until It's Too Late"
07.26.2022 | 3:01 AM ET
@Tartara having a second look, I think what's hurting you here is grammar.
You wrote:
2K in all of my picks !
( non parlay - round - way of winning )
Which is very ambiguous to the point that your meaning is indeterminable. I think I know what you meant and don't believe there's any malignancy in what you wrote.The most correct way to read that sentence would effectively mean absolutely none of your bets should be cashed, because you specify non-parlay-round-way of winning.
Read-as-written, your text excludes every possible way you could in fact win a bet by making reference to your picks, because a fighter winning by decision is not a moneyline bet, it's technically a prop, as would be every other pick you made. You have conflated decision with moneyline, and that is not how the market works.
I know what you were trying to say--you did mean moneyline, but you didn't pick moneyline, and at the end of all things you wrote 2K all my picks.
For there to be syntax between what you wrote and your picks, you would have needed to pick fighters without any method of winning--including by decision (which is possible to do via the tapology picking interface) because only in that instance would your picks necessarily be considered moneyline bets purely as a consequence of every other type of pick made by method or round being excluded.
Does that make sense?
Anyway, at the end of all things, I don't think you should lose any money nor win any money. That should be written off as a push.
You wrote:
2K in all of my picks !
( non parlay - round - way of winning )
Which is very ambiguous to the point that your meaning is indeterminable. I think I know what you meant and don't believe there's any malignancy in what you wrote.The most correct way to read that sentence would effectively mean absolutely none of your bets should be cashed, because you specify non-parlay-round-way of winning.
Read-as-written, your text excludes every possible way you could in fact win a bet by making reference to your picks, because a fighter winning by decision is not a moneyline bet, it's technically a prop, as would be every other pick you made. You have conflated decision with moneyline, and that is not how the market works.
I know what you were trying to say--you did mean moneyline, but you didn't pick moneyline, and at the end of all things you wrote 2K all my picks.
For there to be syntax between what you wrote and your picks, you would have needed to pick fighters without any method of winning--including by decision (which is possible to do via the tapology picking interface) because only in that instance would your picks necessarily be considered moneyline bets purely as a consequence of every other type of pick made by method or round being excluded.
Does that make sense?
Anyway, at the end of all things, I don't think you should lose any money nor win any money. That should be written off as a push.
* Edited at 07.26.2022, 3:13 AM ET *
This user is suspended from posting until 9 years, 1 month, 2 weeks, 2 days, 12 hours, and 53 minutes from now.
07.26.2022 | 4:11 AM ET
2K Negumereanu, Mayes, Lewis, Pantoja, Moreno, Dober, Nunes (Parlay).
This user is suspended from posting until 9 years, 1 month, 2 weeks, 2 days, 12 hours, and 53 minutes from now.
07.26.2022 | 9:27 AM ET
7k nunes/moreno parlay
3k lewis/sergei does not go distance
anthony smith 1k
alex perez 1k
dober/alves does not go distance 2.5 k
3k lewis/sergei does not go distance
anthony smith 1k
alex perez 1k
dober/alves does not go distance 2.5 k
"Too much wine "