Revisitng the argument that steriods does not impact out come of fights

Few months back prior to increased drugtesting, we had several lengthy debates in which some members, I won't name names, but you all know whom I am referring to suggested that performance enhancers where not beneficial to fighters nor could they impacted the results of the fight. Most of this hung on the idea that more clean fighters have beaten fighters on performances enhancers. I would like to ask if anyone still holds to there guns on this stance, since the events of the past few months?  Reason I bring this up is because some people where quite adamant that the evidence favored there argument (that peds where not beneficial), and I I would like to know as maybe others would as well, is if people who held these believes still agree with that stance or have they changed there minds. If you still believe that they  do not benefit or can impact the results of a fight and be willing to provide an argument for why not, that be greatly appreciated.

Oh Marone.....my IQ hurts.