Tapology Forums
UFC needs injury fail safe
Anonymous Mode
You are not logged in to Tapology. When browsing anonymously, profanities and images are automatically removed from the forum.
09.14.2012 | 4:16 PM ET
With a system like this the only way the UFC would have a problem is if 2 of the 3 fighters had to call out, but when that happens the UFC could still try and do what they do now for fight changes. The chance of 2 fighters getting hurt and then not finding anyone willing to fight the guy that isn't hurt would be slim to none.
This way would be simple, cheap (compared to canceled events), and less stressful on fighters. Not to mention makes for better fights if a fight is changed, due to both fighters having a chance to prepare for the backup fight. How does the UFC not have a system like this in place?
* Edited at 09.14.2012, 4:21 PM ET *
Responses
09.14.2012 | 4:43 PM ET
"Pretend to be someone you're not once, and you're a liar. Do it every day, and you're a professional."
09.14.2012 | 7:02 PM ET
Bottom line is yes its a bit more load on the fighter and the camp, but if managed properly shouldn't impact training that much until its time to switch to the back up plan.
Look at Jon Jones because of 151, you think that the stress of all the flack flying his way isnt hindering his camp more than it would have to set a backup plan months ago and tweek his main plan a bit as they were making it?
09.14.2012 | 7:02 PM ET
That is good in theory, but probably wouldn't work smoothly in actuality. The injuries are annoying me to, but I still don't think they are bad enough that they have ruined too many cards, and would require that approach. Even if they did use that, the replacement will still be disappointing, like they are now
"“I don’t train, I meditate”- Olaf Alfonso"