THE ****** UP FANTASY FOOTBALL LEAGUE

10 spots only in the league, I got one, wolf's got one, Wish has got one and I assume Lopati wants one so he's got one. Anyone else wanna join? It's not first come first serve btw, people that have been on this site longer have more priority, so do people who post more and people who I talk to more, etc. It's called the ****** Up Fantasy Football league for a reason, this league is for hardcores only or people who want a major challenge.

The league's called "F*cked Up Fantasy Football", it's on ESPN. The password is "anikismygod". People who join that idk will get kicked out. The draft is this Saturday, August 18 at 8PM. I don't know how to change it but if I find out how, I'll change it. 

I'll just post the scoring system and the rosters right here.

Current Roster Size: 22 Total Starters: 14 Total On Bench: 8 (1 IR)

POSITION STARTERS MAXIMUM Quarterback (QB) 1 No Limit Running Back (RB) 2 6 Wide Receiver (WR) 2 6 Tight End (TE) 1 3 Flex (RB/WR/TE) 1 N/A Defensive Tackle (DT) 1 No Limit Defensive End (DE) 1 No Limit Linebacker (LB) 1 No Limit Cornerback (CB) 0 No Limit Safety (S) 0 No Limit Defensive Back (DB) 1 N/A Team Defense/Special Teams (D/ST) 1 2 Place Kicker (K) 1 2 Head Coach (HC) 1 No Limit Bench (BE) 8 N/A Injured Reserve (IR)

SCORING Passing Every 25 passing yards (PY25) 1 TD Pass (PTD) 6 Interceptions Thrown (INT) -2 2pt Passing Conversion (2PC) 2 400+ yard passing game (P400) 2 Rushing Every 10 rushing yards (RY10) 1 TD Rush (RTD) 6 2pt Rushing Conversion (2PR) 2 200+ yard rushing game (RY200) 2 Receiving Every 10 receiving yards (REY10) 1 TD Reception (RETD) 6 2pt Receiving Conversion (2PRE) 2 200+ yard receiving game (REY200) 2 Miscellaneous Kickoff Return TD (KRTD) 6 Punt Return TD (PRTD) 6 Fumble Recovered for TD (FTD) 6 Total Fumbles Lost (FUML) -2 Kicking Each PAT Made (PAT) 1 Each PAT Missed (PATM) -1 Total FG Missed (FGM) -1 FG Made (0-39 yards) (FG0) 3 FG Made (40-49 yards) (FG40) 4 FG Made (50+ yards) (FG50) 5 Defensive Players Interception Return TD (INTTD) 6 Fumble Return TD (FRTD) 6 Blocked Punt or FG return for TD (BLKKRTD) 6 Blocked Punt, PAT or FG (BLKK) 2 Each Interception (INT) 2 Each Fumble Recovered (FR) 2 Each Fumble Forced (FF) 0.5 Each Safety (SF) 2 Assisted Tackles (TKA) 0.25 Solo Tackles (TKS) 0.5 Passes Defensed (PD) 0.25 Head Coach Team Win (TW) 1 Team Loss (TL) -1 Team Defense / Special Teams Each Sack (SK) 1 Interception Return TD (INTTD) 6 Fumble Return TD (FRTD) 6 Kickoff Return TD (KRTD) 6 Punt Return TD (PRTD) 6 Blocked Punt or FG return for TD (BLKKRTD) 6 Blocked Punt, PAT or FG (BLKK) 2 Each Interception (INT) 2 Each Fumble Recovered (FR) 2 Each Fumble Forced (FF) 0.5 Each Safety (SF) 2 Passes Defensed (PD) 0.25 0 points allowed (PA0) 5 1-6 points allowed (PA1) 4 7-13 points allowed (PA7) 3 14-17 points allowed (PA14) 1 28-34 points allowed (PA28) -1 35-45 points allowed (PA35) -3 46+ points allowed (PA46) -5 Less than 100 total yards allowed (YA100) 5 100-199 total yards allowed (YA199) 3 200-299 total yards allowed (YA299) 2 350-399 total yards allowed (YA399) -1 400-449 total yards allowed (YA449) -3 450-499 total yards allowed (YA499) -5 500-549 total yards allowed (YA549) -6 550+ total yards allowed (YA550) -7

@messiah if it doesn't involve you stay out of it.  petty little comments are not grounds for suspensions if we haven't already been warning the 2 individuals involved.  

on that note, lopati and wolfman, you are both hereby warned... give it a rest.

i will abide by anything gregory or jeremy says. always.

jeremy is definitely a soothing person to write me a couple of e-mails. i appreciate his help immensely. thank you.

How long have they been making general comments for people to stop making underhanded comments to someone if you don't like that person.

When have you ever listened to that, the answer is never.

leaving thread.

* Edited at 08.12.2012, 8:09 PM ET *

i would hardly say this thread got out of hand and caused a problem. 

on the other hand, messiah, there's been plenty of threads that you have been involved in that have legitimately been nasty and gotten out of hand.  that's the difference.

Yes, me saying Fitch was a punk and hypocrite for calling BJ a coward was so nasty. You gave me a warning to stay away from Bill like a week before and the second I said anything even in his thread, boom the suspension was instantaneous, wolf has been causing little riffs with Lopati and me for quite a while, you have said the same sort of thing to Wolf plenty of times, but everytime, I get suspended, he gets another warning.

And please don't act like Wolf wasn't involved with every single one of the threads you are talking about. 

lastly, the members who are in hot water know they are in hot water.  wolfman knows it.  we're not letting him off the hook.  but we're also giving him the opportunity to get beyond the mess of the past month.

@messiah like anik, you are already in instant-suspension mode.  you've had enough history that it's just the way it is. wolfman isn't there yet.

plus i started the Bill Burgess appreciation and that thread was a huge success and bill is humbled and happy about it. i helped someone be happy on here. i'm glad to help bill and anik.

* Edited at 08.12.2012, 8:26 PM ET *

@Wolf you helped me with my betting, that made me happy.

@Gregory Hey, I've been good the last month, just saying.

Instant suspension status? Suspensions should be evaluated and should reflect each post or posts in a given situation. Not due to someone's history. I post something suspension worthy, suspend me. Same goes for Wolf, or anyone else for that matter. Not suspend me for posting something completely innocent and then not suspend Wolf from being an annoying instigator just due to our histories with you and the site. I'm sure you'll throw out the "your site" thing and yes obviously that is the conversation ender and the only thing that matters, but that doesn't mean that ethically and logically that I don't have the right of it. 

* Edited at 08.12.2012, 8:31 PM ET *

I made the same argument Chase, only to no avail.

It's not as bad as it sounds, I like living life on the edge :D

@wolfman quit with the i'm so innocent thing

@messiah no, it's just not how we do it. people who have history get stricter punishment. that's how it works in the courtroom too. not so unusual.  little 1 hour suspensions wouldn't do anything to deal with repeat offenders.  anik's suspensions got larger and larger and i hope he got the point.

@anik yes it seems like you've been a lot more chill lately and i appreciate that.


honestly, i appreciate all of you guys who spend so much time here. the goal is to not ban ANYONE.  but we need to somehow enforce things within the community.  it's a work in progress.

i was bummed out to have to perma-ban @brad last night. the dude went insane.

If a robber gets out of jail, you don't put him back in jail for 10 years for jay walking. 

And conversely, if someone constantly steals a pack of gum, over and over again because they think they can, you eventually give them more than a slap on the wrist. 

Brad got perma banned? What did he do besides call you a ****? (Not that he needed to do anything else)

* Edited at 08.12.2012, 8:37 PM ET *

I really thought that whole Brad situation was a misundersanding but I guess not.

@russello.  thank you. i have helped quite a few people on Tapology with the wagering aspect. Cal1 made some real money with some help from me too.

* Edited at 08.12.2012, 8:41 PM ET *

Who's Brad?

jaywalking no, but judges obviously dole out harsher and harsher penalties for repeat offenders.  it's just normal. it's how you get the point across!

i gave brad 7 days for calling me a ****, because i figured he just was upset or in a bad mood.  which he probably was. but then he went crazy with the talk-to-tapology box.  7 days turned into 1 month. and then 1 month turned into goodbye.

however there is at least 1 person here who is a really good member that had a similar thing happen and then they apologized. so i guess you never know.

i'm too much of a softie.

each of you could probably get away with calling me a mega-triple-**** and you wouldn't get banned. not after all the contributions you've made.  i'd be mad, though.

brad didn't have that luxury.