Would You Rather?

I've been an active member of the tapology forum community for the past year and a half and I noticed that we always talk about fantasy situations, but never really have made a forum strictly dedicated to it.

This is my attempt at starting a fire.

First question, would you rather have UFC continue to doctor up lackluster and disappointing cards like UFC 147 after injury destroys what could have been, and have them continue to promote it like we never noticed; or would you rather the UFC cancel the card entirely and/or postpone the event until the main event fighters are healthy?

For example, UFC 147 would have been Sonnen v. Silva and Wandy vs. Belfort would be rescheduled?

If you enjoy this forum, or if it takes off, please thumb up this post. I want to see 100+ :)

Coming from someone who bought tix to UFC 149 expecting to see Aldo, I would like some of my money back, or the option to sell back my tickets...

I'd rather they show the fight cards regardless of whether or not the original fighters are on the card. It lowers the number of PPV's and the UFC's income goes down, the fighters won't get payed as much and theres allways an exciting fight other then the main event. Just my opinons.

Personally I think a card should be what its broadcasted as, or it should be postponed. Quite frankly, its garbage that Diaz vs Miller can't be on a real UFC number card, but Faber v. Barao can be. If its on pay per view, its needs to be top tier or upcoming fighters. Save the junk for cable.