Lawler vs. MacDonald II

Given the amount of training fighters do, if you're on roids, it's gonna be extremely hard not to wind up ripped as **** when taking something that allows you to train harder, faster, and more.

There's a reason that the majority of guys who have failed the eye test for years (Vitor, Lombard, Reem) were all basically caught. I mean, it's not an absolute given that they're going to get gigantic. Chael willingly makes jokes about the amount of **** in his system during the first Silva fight and he pretty much looked the way he always did. I guess that makes sense seeing as how he was pretty much always on something, but he didn't really look like a typical juicer. I personally find it pointless to speculate on who is or is not on something. Stricter testing and stricter penalties for testing positive will push a lot of guys who were using to get clean hopefully. If we are going to play the speculation game I find it a lot more easy to believe that a guy who went from not really giving a **** and fighting at 185 to becoming the champion at 170 in his 30s would be more likely to cheat than a 25 year old who has looked like a future champion since his UFC debut.

Well, both guys have undoubtedly passed a lot of urine tests as they've both fought a lot for the UFC.

Such a better title fight than Hendricks/Lawler III. Both of these guys can finish this but Robbie definitely has the better chance for a highlight KO and I think that's his best shot. Unlike the Hendricks style match-up where Robbie could outlast Hendricks, I think 5 rounds in this rematch will help Rory as he will likely not gas out. But, Rory has to avoid the big shots and mix up his attacks like against Tarec, he's a solid pick if he can put it all together. With that said, I'm going back and forth on this one, Lawler's gas tank and takedown defense has gotten so much better over the years and I think Rory has some weaknesses Robbie can exploit.