Topic: Machida vs. Jackson
Machida vs. Jackson Prediction Commentary
Anonymous Mode
You are not logged in to Tapology. When browsing anonymously, profanities and images are automatically removed from the forum.
10.11.2010 | 6:21 PM ET
Prediction: wrong Machida wrong Decision
This is the official prediction commentary thread for Machida vs. Jackson. Let's see what you've got.
"This is the droid you're looking for."
Responses Page 3
12.20.2010 | 5:29 AM ET
Prediction: wrong Machida wrong Decision
I agree that the scoring system is far too ambiguous. In fact, I think that any system that asks a judge to determine a round or fight winner our right is too ambiguous. I also think it is wrong to try to define and compartmentalize different techniques and styles used for fighting (striking, grappling, submissions) into judging criteria. Instead, the judges should be looking at the results of a round and breaking down the effects the fighters had on one another.
This is what the RAMMA systems is designed to facilitate. By giving scores on Damage, Danger, and Control at the end of each round, the character of the rounds are appropriately taken into consideration and given their due weight. Rounds with little action don't garner the fighters many points, while domination by one competitor will give him a significant advantage when the scores are tallied.
This is what the RAMMA systems is designed to facilitate. By giving scores on Damage, Danger, and Control at the end of each round, the character of the rounds are appropriately taken into consideration and given their due weight. Rounds with little action don't garner the fighters many points, while domination by one competitor will give him a significant advantage when the scores are tallied.
"Any rational society would either kill me or put me to some use."
