UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Hill

LMAO you are exactly the type I am talking about. Gamrot outstruck Arman, out wrestled Arman, inflicted more damage on Arman and controlled Arman. Gamrot literally won in every single criteria. You are clueless as to how fights are scored. Not a single judge had Arman winning that fight. Yet you have the audacity to call me out for thinking Gamrot won..? Sorry bud, but we aren't all as dumb as you. 
Thanks for proving my point!

Funny how when I call something out the culprits come crawling out of their little holes and prove me right with their ******ation.
The future of America is truly f*cked if this is the next generation. We already free falling as a country.
Most kids these days can't name 20 states but can name every single Kardashian sister. lol sooo sad!!!

@Anal**** Arman definitely beat Gamrot and that decision was a robbery.

Also I agree with everything else you said, and I have it on good authority that your mother tastes like when you leave a headache tablet too long on your tongue.

Did you literally read anything I just typed...? Serious question. Are you REALLY this stupid ****les? 

You're just another clueless crackbaby with a ill-informed **** opinion. I broke it down why Arman lost, he lost in EVERY category. & your rebuttal is "he clearly lost, it was a robbery." Then go on to insult someones mother...? Must be nice behind the safety of your computer screen huh ****les? lol You're an absolute joke

People like you shouldn't have internet access or a platform to spread their uneducated dribble.
No judges had Arman winning, check the stats.
It was a clear UNANIMOUS decision win with all 3 judges giving it to Gamrot. 

* Edited at 08.04.2022, 11:16 PM ET *

@Anal**** have you considered the possibility that you're just another quasi-literate imbecile with a Ritalin prescription who smells vaguely of poo and cabbage, wears tracksuits, eats jello powder and who doesn't understand how MMA is scored?

Here's how it's done. Please note I am not interested in what you think about this. I am right, and you are wrong, like a raisin in a salad. This is for the edification of others. It's not up for debate.





Rounds 1&2 for Tsarukyan.

So lets get to the rounds of contention:

R3: Tsarukyan, 10-9. Landed the two best and most significant strikes of the round, a spinning heel kick to the body and a low-hook which actually visibly hurt Gamrot and forced him to shoot for a single leg. Tsaurkyan also landed the better cumulative damage, and outlanded him overall. Ergo, he fulfilled both the primary and secondary criteria, and control should not have entered the decision-making of the judges. Even if that were a factor, control would have been roughly equal for the round anyway.

Gamrot's grappling was not offensively impactful. He had to work extremely hard to secure the two partial take downs he did, and in those exchanges, he did no damage. On closer inspection, this round was not really that close at all, and was quite clearly won by Tsarukyan.

R4: Big, solid lands for Tasurkyan to the head in the opening seconds, forces Gamrot to again shoot a single. Gamrot grapples for a bit and when they separate, Tsarukyan lands a head kick. Gamrot swings for the fences, it grazes Tsarukyan but doesn't land clean. Body kick to spinning backfist lands for Tsaurkyan, and yes, that was, excuse me ladies and gentlemen, 100% a knockdown. Gamrot was not off-balance. He was planted. He got his bell rung and dropped. That's it. End of discussion. Grappling transitions follow, Gamrot gets the better of them. Back to the center. Straight left partially lands for Gamrot, Tsarukyan lands a one-two. Body kick lands for Tsarukyan. Two big straights land for Tsarukyan. BIG audible body land for Tsarukyan. Gamrot shoots again, goes to body lock. Takedown for Gamrot. Takes the back. Goes RNC but it isn't under the chin. Tsarukyan gets to his knees, round finishes with both fighters standing. 10-9 Tsarukyan.

No need to score round five because that gives Tsarukyan 4/5.

In conclusion, yes, that was a robbery. And I'm not one to throw that term out frivolously. A robbery can still happen in a competitive fight. That fight was competitive, but in scoring terms, it wasn't close. Basically, if you genuinely think Gamrot won I'm not interested in ever hearing you score a round of MMA ever again, because you either don't understand what you're watching, or you don't understand the criteria.